Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Commence Diablo Cody bashing
by CarmillaVonDoom
Jun 4th, 2008
04:15:01 PM
3-2-1 JUNO SUCKED!!! ☺
she's awesome.
by Gatsbys West Egg Omlet
Jun 4th, 2008
04:18:23 PM
Juno was great.

and its about time we knew a woman writer's name.

I'm usually fairly open-minded...
by DanielKurland
Jun 4th, 2008
04:18:57 PM
but it really irritates that so many people say Cody is revolutionary, brilliant, or even a good writer. She may be a good writer, but Juno is no indication of that. It's such a shallow, one-sided, buzz word throwing ,trying too hard to be quirky screenplay. And if you remove the good cast, the film is even less redeemable.
I want to marry her
by Quin the Eskimo
Jun 4th, 2008
04:19:24 PM
and have very weird Kewpie kids.
i know thats not the popular opinion,
by Gatsbys West Egg Omlet
Jun 4th, 2008
04:19:41 PM
but i'm fine with that.
Long Kiss Goodnight: The Series
by Christopher3
Jun 4th, 2008
04:20:53 PM
Enough with the indie quirk. It needs action and stuff.
i don't get the Juno bashing.
by Gatsbys West Egg Omlet
Jun 4th, 2008
04:23:51 PM
so the kids talk funny. kids do talk funny. is that the biggest argument against it?

unrealistic dialog? ever see a movie called Good Will Hunting? bad ass film, ridiculous dialog.

"JUNO" WAS OVERRATED!!!!
by Mr. Profit
Jun 4th, 2008
04:26:41 PM
I kept reading posts like that until I actually saw it. It is a good film, plain and simple. Some of the dialogue is a little stupid, but as teens we all used dumb words and slang. So I can't get mad at shit like "Food Baby" and "Fo Shizz". Page was good, but the best part about the movie was Garner and her parents.
Mr. Profit
by Gatsbys West Egg Omlet
Jun 4th, 2008
04:33:00 PM
for sure the best I've seen from Garner.
Leigh Brackett...that's a woman's name.
by Uncapie
Jun 4th, 2008
04:33:29 PM
She wrote "Rio Bravo," the 1946 version of "The Big Sleep" and some movie called the "Empire Strikes Back." She never won an Academy Award, but her work speaks for itself. Then again, the Academy Award doesn't mean shit anymore. If Diablo Cody can win one, then lambast the icon by saying that it looks like a cheap award that your friend would buy you on Hollywood Boulevard that reads, "World's Greatest Screenwriter,"it pretty much sums it up right there.
Ray Winstone lead in Milch's 70s cop series
by ev1ldead
Jun 4th, 2008
04:38:13 PM
Tara could be nice, but thats a news that get me excited.
a dissociative identity disorder?
by newc0253
Jun 4th, 2008
04:52:46 PM
what a coincidence, one of my multiple personalities has the same thing.

the rest are just nuts.

better than the other "cool" movies
by j2talk
Jun 4th, 2008
04:54:13 PM
Juno was great a much funnier film than soome of the other "cool" films of the past yr...Yeah I'm talking to you SuperBad.......
better than the other "cool" movies
by j2talk
Jun 4th, 2008
04:54:22 PM
Juno was great a much funnier film than soome of the other "cool" films of the past yr...Yeah I'm talking to you SuperBad.......
BACKLASH
by Quin the Eskimo
Jun 4th, 2008
04:54:41 PM
it happened to Knocked Up
So boys here gripe about Diablo Cody...
by Boromir
Jun 4th, 2008
04:56:08 PM
What else is new? There's been tons of whining boys around these boards for years, and not one of them seems to have been able to wash that pesky sand out of his vagina so far. It's easier to just put ear plugs in and then hand the poor things a bottle of Massengill that it is to point out that they wouldn't have any need to whine if they'd just stop pouring sand down their wet holes.
Will it have that killer 30's folksy soundtrack?
by James_O'Nasty
Jun 4th, 2008
05:20:20 PM
Cause that was one of Juno's many problems.
The Problem With Diablo Cody
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
05:57:48 PM
Isn't that she's a bad writer who's getting undue recognition. She's a good writer with a unique voice who's getting undue recognition.

The sad part of all this is that she's getting said recognition not because JUNO was a great movie - it was a good movie that was hamstrung by its own vanity (you can't tell me the scene with Rainn Wilson in the convenience store at the beginning isn't cringe-inducing) - but because she's hot (according to some, not me) and because she was a stripper. And because she doesn't mind being provocative. If she didn't have an interesting backstory and an ass, they'd be sweeping her under the rug.

And the biggest travesty is that she's taking away a spotlight from some really fucking great female writers out there who are interested in their craft, not the publicity and their annoying fucking blogs. I just hope that the focus on Cody serves to move the limelight onto her contemporaries at some point. For examples of what Diablo Cody wants to be, see Sarah Silverman.

By the way, if you read any of her further screenplay efforts...um, let's just say they sold on name and hype. I'm not going to call her a One-Hit Wonder just yet, but I'm not going to stray too far from that.
Fuck Brett Ratner
by Judge Briggs
Jun 4th, 2008
06:05:00 PM
Daniel Kurland
by BadMrWonka
Jun 4th, 2008
06:26:51 PM
if that's all you saw in Juno, I feel bad for you. seems you're the only one, since virtually every other person on the world loved it.

not saying popularity = quality (Titanic, anyone?) but I mean come on. there has to be an element of "I have to be different and cool" to anyone that hates on a funny, sweet movie like Juno. right? it's like calling a kitten ugly.

Umm.. Jersey Girl pard deux?
by mcgillj77
Jun 4th, 2008
06:58:05 PM
sorry.. but a sweet movie? I mean.. c'mon.. no offense.. but Juno was quirky.. for quirky's sake.. it was.. it was a cute film. and nothing wrong with that.. BUT.. how you can praise Juno one one hand..while I remember almost this entire BOARD shit all over Kevin Smith's "sweet" Jersey Girl (saw it opening weekend.. avoiding Scoobs and that "christ" movie). And yeah.. I can say it felt a lil.. almost after school special-ish.. but helll.. so did Juno to me.. but.. much like that.. what really carried it was some great casting in both films.. I reserve judgment on Cody as a "screenwriter" she has several more projects in the pipeline.. but.. c'mon.. what's the BIG story about her upcoming film? Megan Fox's TITS!!! nothing wrong with that.. hell I'll get it on dvd and freeze frame like the rest of the guys out there. but that's not a REASSON to see a movie.. just a good incentive. Juno was good.. and cute.. and quirky.. sometimes more for its own sake than necessary.. although I will say I enjoyed the kind of off bear soundtrack, reminded me alot in spirit anyway of Wes Anderson's Rushmore song choices.. but if I want to see a BRILLIANT Jason Reitman film.. his wickedly saritic "Thank You For Smoking" still has my ticket.. and just cause its popular. doesn't mean its great.. and just cause it lose money doesn't mean it wasn't AMAZING (Shawshank Redemption *ahem*). But.. for me. Juno was saved by it cast.. just amazing through and through.. and.. I don't see it being all that great without them.. they just fit in that weird lil quirky world.. that's what made it work.. not some particularly hackneyed dialogue.. sorry.. but that's just the way I see it.. and if you're read this far.. thank you, Flame on...
BadMrWonka
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
06:58:07 PM
I don't agree with your kitten analogy, though I see where you're coming from.

I didn't hate JUNO - I actually liked very much about it, so you can't call me a hater. But there were PARTS of it that I hated, and hated deeply, the cutesy dialogue in many spots being part of that. What really bothers me is that I thought the writing was the weakest part of the movie. The story was good, but what really sold the story were the performances (specifically Garner and Simmons, just to echo the person who wrote that previously). What infuriates me is that Cody gets so much credit for that movie going right when what was most right about it should be credited to the cast and director.

It reminds me of a few years ago when Sofia Coppola won the Oscar for Best Screenplay for LOST IN TRANSLATION. What made that movie great had NOTHING to do with the screenplay, but they didn't want to give her the Best Director statue. To me, this is more or less the same situation. It's always frustrating to have to explain that to people, because it sounds like I hated the movie, which isn't true - I thought most of it was lovely. It's just that the bad parts, for me, sought to kill the good parts.
Mr. Winston
by gruntybear
Jun 4th, 2008
06:58:30 PM
How about backing up that rant with some actual names of "really fucking great female writers out there who are interested in their craft" and some examples of their superior work? Otherwise you're just haughtily pissing in the wind.
Juno was OK
by snowpuff
Jun 4th, 2008
07:05:48 PM

by Lance4431
Jun 4th, 2008
07:07:17 PM
Diablo Cody is just doing stuff that Gilmore Girls did almost a decade ago.
Gilmore Girls?
by Lance4431
Jun 4th, 2008
07:08:32 PM
Diablo Cody is just doing stuff that Gilmore Girls did almost a decade ago. Juno was OK, not worthy of the hate it recieves. I do believe the cast made it seem better than it was.
I did not like JUNO!
by Frat Boy
Jun 4th, 2008
07:23:27 PM
Having said that, I think Diablo Cody is an incredibly gifted and talented writer. It's not a bad thing to say that JUNO was simply not your cup of tea. Her blog is awesome, and I really enjoyed her book "Candy Girl." She seems like a really nice and down to earth person. Being a struggling screenwriter myself, there's no way I'm bashing a writer for bringing a little fame to the craft.
bringing a little "fame" to the craft..
by mcgillj77
Jun 4th, 2008
07:30:50 PM
that's really part of the PROBLEM isn't it? People who are more.. worried about their popularity as a PERSON rather than the quality of their work.. the whole.. well.. she was a down on her luck stripper.. I mean.. Robert Towne could be a one eyed alcoholic with tourette's.. but I wouldn't know.. and his work, good and bad, has spoken for itself. I mean.. John August.. has several good scripts out there.. but.. aside from a lil back story on the dvd of "The Nines" a truly baffling.. but interesting movie.. I really don't know a thing about the man.. just.. when I see his name on a box.. it makes me go hmmm.. I might like to see that.. based on his track record.. and his body of WORK. I don't begrudge her a lil promotion.. but let the work spesk for itself is all the above poster was saying.. and I agree really.
gruntybear
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
07:31:13 PM
Why, because if I don't you've proven some kind of major point? Wow, way to call me out.

Fact is that anyone who works in this business knows exactly what I'm talking about. You want me to write a list of countless female writers who are just waiting for their first break but not finding traction because they don't write "commercial" material? I could. Oh, but you challenged me on it, so they don't exist, right?

Get a clue. How about the ESTABLISHED female writers that you never hear anything about? How about Diane English (the creator of MURPHY BROWN and writer for the upcoming THE WOMEN)? How about Katherine Fugate (with THE SENATOR'S WIFE in the works and VALENTINE'S DAY, a GREAT script, in production)? How about Leslie Dixon (whose DARK FIELDS is one of the better unproduced screenplays in town)?

How about this: Candace Bushnell. All the did was create and write one of the best (and most popular to boot) TV series of all time and pen the script to a movie that just opened to $60 million. Why aren't they parading her around for SEX AND THE CITY and lauding her accomplishments? Oh, yeah - cuz she's fifty and never pole-danced. You think Diablo Cody has half the talent she has? Please.
HEY ASSHOLES!!! (Showtime, Spielberg, and Dickablow "15mins" Cod
by sevadro
Jun 4th, 2008
07:35:59 PM
Dissociative identity disorder is not fodder for comedy! That shit is not fucking funny! Try living with someone who has it! No laughs, believe me. Spielberg is supposed to be socially conscious? Fuck these exploitive, out of touch, self-aggrandizing, pieces of Hollywood shite!
Mr. Winston
by BadMrWonka
Jun 4th, 2008
07:43:42 PM
I disagree completely. I thought the performances were great, but the writing was outstanding. now, you can argue that Jason Reitman contributed a lot to the pacing and the plot in general, but still.

the scene where Juno drops off the note, and Bateman doesn't get it, but Jennifer Garner does...

the note being framed, the contents of which we don't see until after the reveal of what happens with the pregnancy, so that it gives us new insight into Juno's character, and her plan.

the conversations between Juno and Pauly, if not very realistic in some parts, are very well plotted out.

the characters of Juno's parents are both portrayed amazingly by Simmons and C.J. Craig, but their characters were unusual and interesting ON THE PAGE. having the pregnant teen's parents be so endlessly devoted, yet not 1-dimensional, is an extremely difficult thing to write.

the scene where Juno and Bateman share a moment, and because of how well fleshed out their characters are, the tension is SO intense, we just HATE the idea that they might kiss, or something might happen. and in a lesser movie, they probably would have.

little lines like Juno's friend talking about Woody Allen, the conversation between Juno's stepmom and the lab tech.

the movie succeeds because it's written amazingly well. people get hung up on the indie music, the weird visual style, the teen dialogue, and they think that it's the emperor's new clothes. people love to hate things like that. but it's really not what the movie is about, and I question the attention span of anyone that thinks that's all there is to this film. there are plenty of quirky movies with all of those surface things, but none of them are as successful commercially and critically as Juno, because that's all they have. there's no there there. beneath all of that stuff, in Juno, was a tremendously well-written movie.

When Pauly wins the race, and runs right out of the stadium, with the voiceover and everything, I mean that is PERFECT. it's shot well, and it's acted well, but if you read the script, that was ALL RIGHT ON THE PAGE.

Juno was well written, period. the irony here is that I am not as inclined as many other people to think Diabo Cody has a huge amount more great scripts in her. she's a first timer, and she may have just blown her whole life's worth of great ideas in 90 minutes. who knows?

But Juno is all about the writing, that's all I have to say.

Mr. Winston
by sambrook
Jun 4th, 2008
07:44:52 PM
Candace Bushnell isn't being celebrated because all she did was write the book the series was based on - and that didn't last long as source material for six seasons and a movie. As far as I can remember she ddn't write any of the TV series and she definitely didn't write the film. To be honest I'm sure Cody doesn't mind the fame that comes with the backstory - she's a writer who's just made her first big break, she's bound to try and secure her position, who wouldn't? - but 99% of the hype about her being a stripper and whatnot is down to the media looking for an exciting angle.
sambrook
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
07:54:11 PM
You're right in the fact that she doesn't get WGA credit for writing the series or the movie...but suffice to say she was a major driving force in everything that happened with both the series and the film. Put it this way: she was more important to the show and to the film than the individual script and screenwriters, and she did more to write both than Speilberg or Lucas have done with any of their recent projects.

As to your second point, I don't begrudge Cody one bit the fact that she's taking her newfound fame and running with it. If nothing else she's a tremendous businesswoman and knows exactly what she's doing in that regard. But her fame has little to do with the media - who of course were going to embrace her - and everything to do with the studio pimping out her image. Be serious now: if she WASN'T a stripper and WASN'T hot, would anyone know what she looked like? Would she have been on LETTERMAN? You and I both know the answer to that.
BadMrWonka
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
07:59:53 PM
OK, I think I failed at making my point clearly. It's not that I don't agree with you on a lot of what you said. I think there are very solid parts of the screenplay. I don't think it's the greatest depiction of teen life ever, but I think much of it is strong.

However, you HAVE to concede that the thing people remember about the screenplay - whether good or bad - is the dialogue. There's no way around that. And without it, there would not be half the churning system that is Diablo Cody.

As far as I'm concerned, some of the best dialogue in the world is of the stylized variety, but JUNO took it WAY too far WAY too often. And it doesn't have anything to do with "the way teens talk" (not quoting you, just citing a popular phrase). Look, I'm not that old - if you want to know how teen kids really talk, it's FAR closer to SUPERBAD than to JUNO.

Was the writing good? Definitely. Was it great? Small parts of it, but mostly I don't think so. Is there better stuff out there? Absolutely. Would this have been NEARLY as good without the cast assembled? No way.
Mr. Winston
by BadMrWonka
Jun 4th, 2008
08:30:52 PM
the thing people remember most about a lot of films are the dialogue. that's because the films without good dialogue are either crappy action films, or just crappy films period.

what people remember of a film, or talk about, or whatever, is irrelevant to me. people might not even recognize that the writing in a film like Juno is what sets it apart from other films, but it is. and people clearly gravitated towards it. they don't have to understand the intricacies of screenwriting in order to appreciate it.

and do I find it slightly annoying when people ask themselves questions and then answer them? yes.

BadMrWonka
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
08:37:41 PM
OK, you go and get annoyed while I try to explain to you my point of view.

No one ever said anything about the "intricacies of screenwriting". The point I was making was that the only MEMORABLE part of the script, both for people who liked it and people who didn't, was the dialogue. Not the story. Anyone could have written this story. There are much better stories out there. Some people bought the dialogue, some didn't. Most, you're correct, gravitated towards it. However, I chalk that up mostly to it being something new and/or different rather than it being something great. It's the same exact reason people went for CLERKS more than a decade ago - no one was writing like that at the time. But man, has CLERKS not held up at all in the years since.

As far as your assertion that the thing most people remember about a film being the dialogue...bullshit. And I think you know that's bullshit, but you backed yourself into a corner.
Amy Heckerling
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
08:55:11 PM
I'm glad you brought up CLUELESS, Flip63Hole, because like an idiot I left Amy Heckerling off my list.

She directed one of the best teen movies ever, FAST TIMES, which is tenfold the movie that JUNO is. And what's her recognition? Most people think it was Cameron's Crowe's directorial debut.

Then she wrote and directed CLUELESS. Now I won't try to compare CLUELESS to JUNO because I think they're trying to do very different things thematically and conceptually. But CLUELESS was the JUNO of its time, offering a different look at teenagers with some snazzy, offbeat dialogue.

But how many people actually know Amy Heckerling wrote and directed CLUELESS? Really? Why didn't they send HER out on the talk show circuit, help HER develop her own brand? Heckerling has an entire career of writing, directing and producing, but 9 out of 10 people would have no idea who she is. Because she's not a stripper. She can't be marketed because she's "normal".

There are a bunch of Amy Heckerlings working in Hollywood right now, and they'll be around in ten, fifteen years. Doubt Cody will be that lucky.
Thank god I don't have showtime
by BitterMan23
Jun 4th, 2008
08:59:23 PM
I hope this show keeps her so busy she doesn't have time to write overrated bullshit 'indie' comedies.
I like Cody and Juno, BadMrWonka, BUT
by necgray
Jun 4th, 2008
09:21:53 PM
I think you're ignoring some of the weaknesses. My biggest complaint about the film was that some of the character relationships were sloppy. The worst offender here was Juno's relationship with Alison Janney. It just felt poorly written. They start out combative, then they make up, then for NO REASON at all they start getting combative again. As a subplot, it was poorly developed. It actually was fine up to the ultrasound when Janney defends her to the nurse. That was a small victory for Juno and a nice way to wrap up that subplot. But then they start arguing again. With no resolution. What was the point of that? It distracted from the main thrust of the story. I was also a little confused and unhappy about her relationship with Bleeker. It was relegated to a subplot throughout much of the first half of the film, but then it becomes the most important part of the third Act. I felt Cody could have seeded that better and made Bleeker more of a presence in the first half of the film. There are incredible moments in the script, without a doubt. Almost every scene involving Garner's character is great. And no, it's not just Garner. The dialogue at the mall between the two characters blew me away. Her dad is a well-drawn "shit happens" kind of dad. I liked it a lot, BUT Ratatouille was a better script. I think Juno could've used another couple of polishes before going into production.
Mr. Winston
by BadMrWonka
Jun 4th, 2008
09:22:03 PM
I Wasn't annoyed by what you were saying...just the asking yourself questions thing. man I hate that.

and I do believe people remember dialogue more than any other single thing from movies they like. how can you argue that? they quote them constantly, that's what people do. remember any lines from Transformers? well that's cos it sucked, hence my original point. I'm not worried about being "backed into corners". partly because it's an AICN talkback, let's not get too deep here. but mostly because I happily admit if I change my mind, am proven wrong, or if I have misspoken. misstyped? well anyway, you get the point.

as for the Clerks comparison, I thank you for that for 2 reasons. one, it's nice that we agree that Clerks is pretty damn terrible. we have some common ground!

two, it illustrates the difference in our opinion on Juno. Juno is NOTHING like Clerks, in my opinion, and shouldn't be compared. Juno is much more of a complete package, and it has not been revered simply for being something new. In fact, I don't think it was revolutionary at all, it was just good. it made some unusual choices, sure, but it's not Pulp Fiction. if you find them comparable, even if only in their impact, then I Think we're arguing different points here. I see nothing similar about them. one has no heart, one is all heart.

whatever got us off on the tangent of what is memorable about Juno aside, my point is simply that, in my opinion, the difference between Juno and other comparable films, is partly the performances, but mostly the writing. Cody may not have another one in her, but man, Juno is damn near perfect.

in all honesty, when you see Juno's parents and their uniqueness, you see those great exchanges in the school hallways with bleeker and juno, all that. how can you NOT chalk that up to good writing? otherwise it's just a byline in a review saying, "despite the best efforts of a great ensemble cast, the film just can't seem to etc. etc." instead, there was just universal praise. and the only haters were those that seemed unable to just watch a sweet funny film without finding something to take a huge shit on. indie music sucks! cutesy dialogue doesn't ring true! blah blah blah. it's easy to be cynical, but (as I said originally...to someone else by the bye), I feel sorry for anyone that just can't enjoy a movie like Juno.

incidentally, re: "disrespecting" the Oscar
by necgray
Jun 4th, 2008
09:27:16 PM
To whoever has a problem with that: get the fuck over it. It's a fucking statue, a false idol created by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Do I want one? Of course. But it's not the Holy Grail. And if you don't understand that she's being self-deprecating by mocking her statuette, then you probably think Stephen Colbert is really an angry conservative newscaster.
Juno was average
by Harrow
Jun 4th, 2008
09:28:25 PM
with the crap roles dished out to Arrested Development superstars the worst of it, but Lars and the Real Girl was amazing, so I'm still looking forward to this.
I don't get it.
by Tourist
Jun 4th, 2008
09:30:24 PM
Mr. Winston you ask why no one is lauding Candice Bushnell? It's not because she's an old hag and because Diablo is hot. It's because Candice is a fucking awful writer responsible for a fucking awful movie. Diablo is a hot piece of ass who also wrote a...wait for it...GOOD movie. An entertaining, interesting, moving movie. Was it the second coming of jesus? No, but neither was Tarantino and look how the world flipped upon his arrival. Thats the nature of celebrity. Talent plus quirky backstory (and a pretty face) will get you further than just talent. What confounds me about Diablo is that she won an award the same year that Tony Gilroy was nominated. Heres a guy with ZERO talent, responsible for a an enormous pile of shit that audiences loathed, whose only claim to recognition is having some famous friends. Yet no one spends their time bitching about him. Why? Because hes NOT a hot chick.
Tourist
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
09:33:29 PM
Your comments about Bushnell and Gilroy...I'm going to guess that you don't even believe them. I get that you're trying to make a point. But come on. If those are actually your opinions then I respect that you have them, but I can't take you seriously.
BadMrWonka
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
09:44:35 PM
I just want to say a couple things about this before I digress:

Of course dialogue is the thing that people talk about most - it's talking! It makes sense to communicate most the verbal parts of film verbally. As an example, I can quote you any great line from RAIDERS, but my favorite part of the movie (and that of many) is when Indy pulls out his gun and shoots the dude swinging the sword at him. It's just hard to recreate the more visual parts of film verbally, so we don't do it as much.

The CLERKS comparison: I wasn't comparing anything about the two EXCEPT the dialogue. And my point being that in a few years I believe people will have soured on that part of JUNO. There will be many, myself included, who still like a lot about the movie, but the banter will have well run its course.

As easy as you think it is to be cynical about a movie, isn't is just as easy to call someone cynical even thought they're just expressing a point of view? Yeah, the dialogue was too much for me and smacked of trying WAY too hard. Yes, the indie music I thought was overused and became an unnecessary character in the story (blame that on the director, though). But did I also think it was sweet and charming and better than most of the movies that came out last year? I did. Sorry if me answering my own question annoyed you, but I'm trying to make a point. I can also say that, while we're in a serious minority, there are a LOT of people who disliked or couldn't tolerate parts of JUNO that aren't cynics.

To get back on the point I was originally trying to make...I don't think JUNO is great, and I don't think Cody deserves any special praise for it, and the bottom line is that if she wasn't a hot stripper, no one would care about who she is just like they don't care about REALLY great female writers out there who aren't actively branding themselves. As yet, I haven't seen anyone deny that last point with any substantial reasoning.
Juno vs Clerks
by necgray
Jun 4th, 2008
09:52:11 PM
For the record, BadMrWonka, I like Clerks quite a lot and would love to know why you think it lacks the "heart" that Juno achieved. It's a different beast, but both beasts have heart. Maybe you've never dealt with a twentysomething identity crisis so the point of the film went past you. No heart my eye...
mr. winston, I agree re: branding
by necgray
Jun 4th, 2008
10:12:25 PM
I like Cody, but I do think she's very self-promoting. I don't think the stripper thing is her own doing, I think that comes from outside. She doesn't seem to actively discourage it, but that's not her thing. Her thing is being vocal and visible and making contacts with equally vocal, visible people. But is this any different than any actor? Particularly someone just starting out. If people have a problem with her self-promotion, they should never read or watch any entertainment gossip. Because it's ALL self-promotion.
i never saw juno and I am still sick of hearing about Diablo Cod
by jccalhoun
Jun 4th, 2008
10:15:09 PM
Diablo Cody was picked by the media as the new it girl and shown down our throat so much that it made me never want to see her film.

Watching the entertainment media fawn all over her was just incredibly strange. Was Juno so much better than other independent films that made it big? Is Diablo Cody that much better of a writer than Michael Arndt (Little Miss Sunshine) or Ryan Fleck (Half Nelson) or Nancy Oliver (Lars and the Real Girl) or any other number of people?
necgray
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
10:21:59 PM
I know what you're saying, but I'm not begrudging her anything SHE'S doing to further her career. You compare her self-promotion to that of a lot of actors. And no, it's not that different. But again, and I am beating the absolute shit out of a dead horse here because no one seems to get it: if she wasn't a hot stripper, no one would CARE about her self-promotion. If she wasn't a hot stripper, every talk show would have been like, "Wait, you're a writer? So the fuck what, get out of here, no one cares about writers." This was the girl the STUDIO chose to promote to get attention for the film. And it worked. Unfortunately, it's led people to believe that she's a GREAT writer. She's an interesting writer and a unique writer, but I don't think she's anywhere near being a great writer. And I think it's sad that there ARE great female writers out there, but they get ignored because they never got naked in front of people for money.
jccalhoun and mr. winston
by necgray
Jun 4th, 2008
10:46:48 PM
jccalhoun first: If I never again hear the phrase "shoved down our throats" in relation to Diablo Cody, it'll be too fucking soon. You know what I'm tired of having shoved down my throat? Baseless opinions from assholes who haven't even watched the movie. And you know what? It feels to me like the hype around her is based more on people hating her than anything. So congrats on keeping her name in the public mind, dipshit.

mr. winston, I get what you mean. She wouldn't have gained media attention without her colorful past. But you know what? Nobody would know about her colorful past if she hadn't written a really good script. If she had written a shitty script, nobody would care if she'd been a stripper. Hell, I'm sure there are plenty of bad scripts floating around written by ex or current strippers. Your point is a weird one. If I'm reading it right, you think that people have been lead to believe she's a great writer because she's received a lot of attention. But based solely on the backlash against her, I'd say you're wrong. I don't think anyone has been lead to believe she's a great writer. If people believe that, it's because they watched the movie and thought she truly is a great writer. *Maybe* the media attention has swayed them to be more enthusiastic about her than they might have been otherwise, but I think you're overstating.

necgray
by BadMrWonka
Jun 4th, 2008
10:52:35 PM
sure, I had a 20's crisis of self...everyond does, I think...but it didn't sound like a bunch of poorly delivered dick jokes...
The problem with Juno
by es4
Jun 4th, 2008
10:56:48 PM
is that the dialogue, if anything, is TOO familiar. It's the exact kind of thing you get from the quirky kids; the ones with the "monkeys are coming after me" hot topic t-shirts, the ones that leave the "going to do the crunk shuffle with my froofy!" away messages, the kind of people that commit smart/snappy responses to memory just in case if the right dialogue happens upon them, they'll be ready to unleash a torrent of wordplay so unnatural and unexpected of casual conversation, that it sucks all the energy right out of the room. I'm VERY familiar with this kind of "quirky" dialogue, and when it's not being used by a close knit circle of friends to try and keen others about their super awesome secret inside jokes, it's directed at you to the point where you want to shake them and scream "I can't get to know you until you drop the act and talk normally!" Yup.
Diablo means "Devil"... need I say more?!
by thebearovingian
Jun 4th, 2008
10:58:14 PM
I agree with Gatsby. GOOD WILL HUNTING is DA BOMB. However, I disagree about it having ridiculous dialogue.

JUNO - I have no opinion of b/c I haven't seen it. You haters have hatingly created hate within me to hate JUNO and to hate its writer. And now I hate you.

necgray
by Mr. Winston
Jun 4th, 2008
11:01:17 PM
You make good points. My point is that she wrote a good script, which is still better than 99% of the muck out there. And I think that no matter who she was it still would have been turned into a movie (although it took a while to even get that done). But once the studio realized that they could market her, they went for it.

It's not that she wrote a bad script; I'm merely saying that, in comparison to a bunch of other talented female writers that I know of...she's not even in the top ten. She's one of the most unique, but certainly not one of the best. But why do most people think she's a "great" writer now? Because she's had so much exposure. And most people are thinking, "Wow, this girl's on TV, she must be really great!" What they should be thinking is, "Wow, this girl's on TV, she must be really marketable!" And there's a HUGE difference there. And I think that helps to bolster her "talent" in a lot of eyes.

All that is to say NOTHING of the fact that JUNO got voted for multiple Oscars, which only furthers the issue and, to me, finally turned the Oscars into the travesty that I had been telling people for years they weren't. It's just totally pathetic to me that JUNO is rewarded for being good and ONCE - which is fifty times the movie JUNO is - got shafted all over the place.
hmm
by slkboxrman
Jun 4th, 2008
11:44:50 PM
wonder if she ripped off a british series for this idea....cody is the ripoff queen it seems.....take a korean film, americanize it, but dont bother changing one of the major characters names...and presto, u got JUNO...
At the risk of sounding repetitive...
by frakthetoasters
Jun 4th, 2008
11:46:34 PM
Diablo Cody rocks. I can't wait to see her work on the small screen.
You can't take what seriously?
by Tourist
Jun 5th, 2008
12:07:28 AM
Bushnell is a fucking atrocious writer. Theres no defending her. Same goes for Gilroy. Neither of them compare to Diablo. Sex and The City? The third Bourne film, which had about as much development, depth and interesting ideas as your typical Segal film, only without the humour? Michael Clayton? A film so shallow and lazily thrown together that its actually less rewarding than a commercial in GQ? Compared to a witty, cute and enjoyable comedy drama? Your honestly claiming that the wretched pile of shit shoe commercial that is the Sex and the City movie is somehow not only compareable to Juno, but better? And you have trouble taking other people seriously? Regarding jccalhoun, yes...based on the films you offered up, she is a much better writer than Ryan Fleck or Nancy Oliver. If you want to talk about performances and direction saviing mediocre scripts, those two examples are perfect. Although, as a finished film, I don't think Juno is any better than Little Miss Sunshine, but the character was alot easier to latch onto for emo chicks. I stil dont get whats wrong with branding the actual creator of the film for once either. Its better than the endless drivel we have to hear about actors that is usually used to sell a movie.
Tourist
by Mr. Winston
Jun 5th, 2008
12:20:24 AM
Candace Bushnell created, oversaw and was the driving force behind one of the five best-written shows in the history of television. I didn't think the SATC movie was a knockout, but to deny that she's a tremendously talented writer based on that? I mean...please. And I'd also like you to point out where I compared JUNO to the SATC movie, because I sure as hell didn't do that. I simply said that Bushnell is a better writer, which is true.

Tony Gilroy not only wrote three of the best action films EVER but also THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATE. And I think this goes without saying, but you're in a serious minority in your opinions on MICHAEL CLAYTON.

Based on that, I don't take you seriously as a commenter on AICN much less someone who understands writing or film in general. You don't like either of those movies? Your prerogative. But making a horrendous blanket statement like you did? Christ, you've got nothing. What's your favorite movie, STRIPTEASE? Get the fuck out of here.
Shouldn't This Debut on Myspace?
by brakula
Jun 5th, 2008
12:48:22 AM
Like totally feral, dog. Isn't Showtime superiously antiqu'd now? The series of the future will rock the mobile video tubes, not the cathode ray tubes.
I still don't get it.
by Tourist
Jun 5th, 2008
01:08:44 AM
Are you joking about Sex and The City? It's not well written. It's not even a passable television drama. Its up there with Models Inc. Let alone amongst the top five of all time. Gilroys work on Bourne went from passable to atrocious and The Devils Advocate also sucked hearty balls. I think your issue with Diablo Cody comes down to your taste, rather then her over exposure. Of course she would seem over exposed to someone whose taste is as appalling as yours. No, seriously, your not joking about Sex and the City?
Tourist
by Mr. Winston
Jun 5th, 2008
01:18:26 AM
I'm not going to debate. Your opinions are a joke to me, and I'm not inclined to dance around the mulberry bush with you for exactly that reason. If you have something to say, that's great. I just don't care.
Regardless of anything
by myspoonistoobig
Jun 5th, 2008
01:21:15 AM
Nobody deserves to be this hyped after writing one movie. I guess the book counts, but still. Juno was better than I expected but I agree it was all performances and not the writing. Although I also loathe Ellen Page.
Banter
by Cobbio
Jun 5th, 2008
01:36:48 AM
I didn't see "Juno" until after it won those awards, so I went in fully prepared to like it. And generally I did. But boy did the dialogue call attention to itself. I didn't like this part of the movie at all. When that guy from "The Office" calls Juno "homeskillet" for no reason other than to sound wink-wink cool, I absolutely winced. Cody threw many take-me-out-of-the-narrative moments like that into the film.

I understand a lot of people like Cody for her unusual characters and wink-wink conversation. Mostly I do too, but if she could tone down her over the top banter so I can start to give a shit about the characters, she'd be a whole lot better, in my opinion.

And...
by Cobbio
Jun 5th, 2008
01:40:20 AM
... Tourist, you're kind of being a tool here. Ease up.
I think Mr. Winston nailed it
by Series7
Jun 5th, 2008
01:45:57 AM
Seeing that 3 of the 5 nominees for best original screenplay were women, she didn't win it just because she is a women.

Also I wonder what her user name on this site is/was, because you know she's had to have been on here before.

Xiphos
by Mr. Winston
Jun 5th, 2008
02:21:04 AM
It would be fine to pick that quote apart...if you weren't a douchebag who was deliberately misquoting me. Obviously, what I said was ONE of the best TV shows of all time, and all I have to back that up is the billions of women who talk about it ad nauseum, the $60 million opening for the movie, and the fact that it was on TIME'S list of the 100 Best TV Shows Ever.

I suppose that calling it one of the most popular shows ever is somewhat subjective, but calling it "not even close by a long shot" is just idiotic. Seeing as how you nailed my quote, though, that shouldn't surprise me.
Series 7...
by Tourist
Jun 5th, 2008
02:24:36 AM
...You are write. She didn't win it just because she was a woman. She won it because its was a good movie. It was this years "Good indie flick". Just like when Pulp Fiction and Tarantino picked up their oscar. Same deal.
Sex and the City, a condensed version...
by BadMrWonka
Jun 5th, 2008
02:47:43 AM
I love shoes!
I shave my vagina!
I'm defined by men!
why can't I find a man?
I need a man to feel complete!
I need shoes to feel complete!
I love to have sex all the time!
I buy expensive things!
being rich and white is awesome!
even though nothing bad happens, we're always stressing out!
shoes are awesome!
my weekly column consists of inane questions!
men are like shoes!
all women care about is men and shoes!
we're so empowered!
let's make a movie to cash...er...revisit these fascinating characters!
we're so awesome!
Xiphos
by Mr. Winston
Jun 5th, 2008
02:48:50 AM
"I copied what you wrote you thin skin jizz monkey."

You know, I'm willing to believe that you're not smart enough to know the difference between that and what you actually did. I'm sorry for being right all the time.
"one of the best (and most popular to boot) TV series of all tim
by Lost Jarv
Jun 5th, 2008
03:34:30 AM
Nope, It was a cut and paste.

I just did it too.

You're kind of a dick, aren't you Winston?

Lost Jarv
by Mr. Winston
Jun 5th, 2008
03:52:20 AM
I'm kind of a dick when people deliberately misquote me, yes.

You have to be smart enough to realize that there's a massive difference between me claiming that SATC was "the best TV series ever" and that it was "ONE of the best TV series ever". Do you see the implication there, the connotation that "one of the best" is far removed from "THE best"? Note also that Xiphos then went on to hem and haw about how ridiculous it would be to call the show the "best ever", as if I had not only said that but anointed it through some canonization process. Why do I feel like I'm teaching second grade here?

You're kind of a moron, aren't you Jarv?
See?
by Boromir
Jun 5th, 2008
04:30:33 AM
Ohhhhhhh, ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, my vagina...just...aches.........
Juno best movie of year, SATC kicked ass
by YouIgnorantGeeks
Jun 5th, 2008
05:31:39 AM
Juno was better then the great but not as great as everyone says No Country For Old Men... Juno was the best movie of year. Gotta love the posers who all of a sudden are jumping on the Juno hating bandwagon. SATC was a phenomenal show. It is one of the best and most loved TV shows of all time. Not THE best of course, but top 10%...and defintely better then most of the crap this past decade (as most HBO/Showtime shows have been). It has won numerous emmy, golden globe, other awards for its cast, its writing, etc... I believe it is also the best selling TV series on DVD ever. So all you little closet homosexual "we are afraid of woman becase we never got any" geeks need to hush. Keep masterbating over evil dead.
Sevadro...
by YouIgnorantGeeks
Jun 5th, 2008
05:34:41 AM
Are you kidding me? You know what else isn't funny? The mafia ruining peoples lives yet you were ok with the Sopranos? If I read the info correctly this script portrays the illness correctly but just shows what she has to deal with and yes it can be funny in the way that all situations can be. I have friends who have this illness, and others who have bi-polar, who can not wait for this. Get over yourself.
YouIgnorantGeeks
by Series7
Jun 5th, 2008
07:36:53 AM
Yeah there may be a Juno hate bandwagon, but I think its more for the sort of praise its getting not so much hate for the movie. The movie is fine little movie, I hate how everyone involved in that movie like to say how indie it was. You can't really have an indie movie when everyone involved is already famous. People are just mad about all the hoopla Juno got for being so real. When all in all Superbad had more realistic sounding teenagers. And it suffers from Little Miss Sunshine syndrome, except that movie actually felt like an indie and had some depth to it that Juno didn't. Also because Cody got the oscar just because it was different. In five years no one except emo hip girls will still be watching Juno because of how good it was.
i dont even want to think about diablo cody
by cheifchirpa3000
Jun 5th, 2008
08:32:21 AM
2 bad points about Juno, the dialogue was really lame and the character was percieved as the weird yet only smart one in the whole film, everyone else was a bumbling moron. 2 bad points about Diablo cody, she isn't that hot, she's jut a "cool chick" cause she has tatoos, andattitude, was an "exotic dancer" and rooing wannabe writers tink they can relate t her and have a really cool conversation with her and then bone her s do the movie execs the oher bad point is that she's getting to much attention for the other point.
also ellen page is unatractive.
by cheifchirpa3000
Jun 5th, 2008
08:35:29 AM
what gives her the right to exist?
Crimeny, I'll never get why people bash Juno so intensely...
by RockLobster800
Jun 5th, 2008
09:21:44 AM
I'm aware it wasnt perfect, and Michael Cera wasnt given enough to do, but come on folks, it was a good show! JK Simmons was brilliant as usual, Ellen Page was great (as usual-shes the only thing I really remember about X3) and although it didnt deal with controversial subject matter that seriously, did it really need to? I mean havent we enough dramas dealing with abortions and teen pregnancys and crap like that-cant we have one that dealt with it another way? I mean c'mon people! And those who complained that she was a smartass-take any screenwriting class, and they'll tell you to make your characters flawed-makes em more interesting. Plus she was at least a likeable smartass. and those who say the dialogue was unrealistic-look at film noir. do people talk like that? nope. and does anybody care? nope! Plus-news flash guys, teenagers have slang! and they talk differently in different areas particualrly around they're friends. I mean in my hometown "pass the mixer" is "I need some lutes for my leets" but if I worte that in a screenplay would I be "unrealistic"? The only thing I complained about was that she said "thundercats are go" instead of "thundercats Ho!"....that was it. It wasnt the best film in the world, but it doesnt deserve the level of scorn being poured on it by people trying to be cool and aloof cos the thing was popular.
Winston
by jmyoung666
Jun 5th, 2008
09:22:24 AM
You lose a lot of credibility when you claim SATC was one of the 5 best shows on TV. Didn't hate it, but it was an incredibly shallow show and Juno is as deep as the ocean by comparison. Further, I do not believe Candace had that much direct involvement with the series. I believe Darren Star was the central force behind the show. Seeing that you are such a huge fan maybe you have more information than I do.
Wow, you really are a pompous dick
by Lost Jarv
Jun 5th, 2008
10:20:53 AM
honest to blog?
by TheBaxter
Jun 5th, 2008
10:35:09 AM
who gives a blog's ass. so Diablog Cody has a new blogedy on the Blogtime Netblog? i couldn't blog less.
rainn wilson's lines in "Juno"
by necgray
Jun 5th, 2008
10:59:28 AM
Since that subject seems to come up a lot in the Juno bashing, I'd like to throw in my $.02 here. I think people mistake his character's lines as genuine when I thought he was purposely using Juno's "hipspeak" to needle her. I got the impression that he sees this girl a lot, hears her talk, maybe is sociable with her himself. I felt that he was using her slang in a social context. If Juno left the store and the camera stayed in the shop, I'm sure we'd see him talk normally to his other customers.
She should go back to stripping.
by fiester
Jun 5th, 2008
11:00:52 AM
Seriously. Flavor of the week little Suicide Girl and her stuff is just tired.
you should go back to... what is it you do?
by necgray
Jun 5th, 2008
02:18:26 PM
Seriously. Hater of the week little AICN Geek and your stuff is just tired.
I'm SHOCK! I cannot believe it!
by Gilkuliehe
Jun 5th, 2008
04:41:06 PM
All these posts and not ONE mentions the incredible talented and amazingly GORGEOUS Toni Collete. What are you, too busy hating Diablo? Well allow me to change the tune by putting some LOVE on this

I'd watch the amazing Toni Collete read the phone book in super slow motion for the rest of my life. I haven't seen one movie where this lady hadn't outshadowed her fellow actors. Also, she's fucking gorgeous and I fell in love with her in MURIEL'S WEDDING. Yes, the movie where she plays that weird fat girl who wants to get married. Oh and JAPANESE STORY was an outstandung one girl show. A class act. I'll watch anything she's on, I don't care if it's written by the Antichrist himself. I love you, Toni!!!

Of course I meant I am IN shock.
by Gilkuliehe
Jun 5th, 2008
04:41:53 PM
Pretend I corrected all other typos, thanks.
juno gets bashed because it was successful
by slappy jones
Jun 8th, 2008
05:22:25 PM
if it was a little seen indie film that flew under the radar the same people attacking it now would probably be singing its praises. the hate is so over the top for such an innocuous little its ridiculous. If it hadn't have made such a big star out of diablo cody or been oscar nominated it would be seeing these kinds of stupid attacks. its pathetic. the film is not a masterpiece but it is hardly deserving of the hate it receives on here any time anyone vaguely involved with thew film is mentioned.
I didn't see "Juno." Probably won't.
by Drunken Rage
Jun 8th, 2008
05:25:46 PM
Trailer was awful and it has been incredibly hyped. Fuck it.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.